People v. Bell

703 N.W.2d 472, 474 Mich. 867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bell. Read the opinion of the Court — 473 Mich. 275
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 23, 2005·No. 128415·Published

Opinion

703 N.W.2d 472 (2005)

PEOPLE v. BELL.

No. 128415.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 23, 2005.

Application for Leave to Appeal

SC: 128415, COA: 259426.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 7, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court for a determination of whether defendant is indigent and, if so, for the appointment of appellate counsel, in light of Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 2582, 162 L.Ed.2d 552 (2005). Appointed counsel may file an application for leave to appeal within the Court of Appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the trial court, within twelve months of the date of the Saginaw Circuit Court's order appointing counsel, in accord with the deadlines in effect at the time defendant was denied counsel. See MCR 7.205(F)(3), MCR 6.311, and MCR 6.429. Counsel may include among the issues *473 raised, but is not required to include, those issues raised by defendant in his application for leave to appeal to this Court. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bell, 703 N.W.2d 472, 474 Mich. 867 (Mich. 2005).

703 N.W.2d 472 (People v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halbert v. Michigan
545 U.S. 605 (Supreme Court, 2005)