People v. Bell
11 P. 327, 70 Cal. 33, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 718
This text of 11 P. 327 (People v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Bell, 11 P. 327, 70 Cal. 33, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 718 (Cal. 1886).
Opinion
The transcript herein does not show that the notice of appeal was served on any one. The law requires that it shall be served on the attorneys of the adverse party (Penal Code, sec. 1240), and the transcript on appeal must show it. (People v. Phillips, 45 Cal. 44; People v. Clark, 49 Cal. 455.) This not being the case, the appeal cannot be considered.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pueblo v. Martínez
53 P.R. Dec. 578 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1938)
People v. Finerty
97 P. 73 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
State v. Preston
30 Nev. 301 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1908)
People v. Brown
84 P. 204 (California Supreme Court, 1906)
People v. Colon
51 P. 1082 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
People v. Swearinger
38 P. 972 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Territory v. Harris
7 Mont. 429 (Montana Supreme Court, 1888)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 P. 327, 70 Cal. 33, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bell-cal-1886.