People v. Bedoya

53 A.D.3d 621, 861 N.Y.S.2d 788
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 22, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 53 A.D.3d 621 (People v. Bedoya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bedoya, 53 A.D.3d 621, 861 N.Y.S.2d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), rendered June 29, 2005, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to hear and report on the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty for which the defendant shall be appointed new counsel, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Queens County shall file its report with all convenient speed.

Prior to sentencing, the defendant moved to withdraw his plea of guilty. The defendant’s right to counsel was adversely affected when his attorney in effect, became a witness against him and took a position adverse to his (see People v Elting, 2 AD3d 455, 456 [2003]; People v Caccavale, 305 AD2d 695 [2003]; People v Bernard, 242 AD2d 387 [1997]; People v Spearman, 210 AD2d 268 [1994]). Consequently the Supreme Court should not have decided the motion without first assigning the defendant new counsel (see People v Elting, 2 AD3d at 456; People v Cac-cavale, 305 AD2d at 695; People v Bernard, 242 AD2d at 387; People v Spearman, 210 AD2d at 268). Accordingly we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County for a hearing on the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant shall be appointed new counsel, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter. We hold the appeal in abeyance pending receipt of the Supreme Court’s report. We express no opinion as to the merits of the defendant’s motion and we decide no other issues at this time. Spolzino, J.E, Baltin, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hayes
140 A.D.3d 1186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Fully
90 A.D.3d 1071 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Vega
88 A.D.3d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Deliser
85 A.D.3d 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Rivera
71 A.D.3d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Molina
69 A.D.3d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Dixon
63 A.D.3d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Barnello
56 A.D.2d 1214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A.D.3d 621, 861 N.Y.S.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bedoya-nyappdiv-2008.