People v. Beavers
This text of 162 A.D.2d 539 (People v. Beavers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered May 17, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not supported by the record and should have been raised by collateral motion (People v Pascale, 48 NY2d 997; People v Conyers, 114 AD2d 967; cf., People v Brown, 45 NY2d 852).
Moreover, the defendant comes forward with no basis for disturbing the sentence which he understood would be imposed when he entered his plea of guilty (People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 A.D.2d 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-beavers-nyappdiv-1990.