People v. Beasley

210 A.D.2d 964, 621 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13447
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Beasley. Read the opinion of the Court — 184 A.D.2d 1003

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends for the first time on appeal that statements of an alleged co-conspirator were inadmissible in the absence of proof that a conspiracy existed at the time the statements were made (see, People v Tran, 80 NY2d 170, 179), and thus has failed to preserve that contention for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). Even if we were to find that the statements were improperly received, defendant was not thereby deprived of a fair trial (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Any error would have been harmless because eyewitness testimony that defendant shot the victim was "essentially unimpeached” (People v Ayala, 75 NY2d 422, 432). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Wiggins, J.—Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Beasley, 210 A.D.2d 964, 621 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

210 A.D.2d 964 (People v. Beasley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ayala
553 N.E.2d 960 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Tran
603 N.E.2d 950 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)