People v. Bean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bean

27 A.D.2d 852, 280 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4599

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 852 (People v. Bean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bean, 27 A.D.2d 852, 280 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 9, 1966, denying defendant’s motion for resentencing, reversed, on the law, and motion remitted to the court below for the purpose of taking further proof (1) as to the dates of the commission of the crimes for which defendant was convicted in Alabama, which crimes resulted in the judgments of conviction by reason of which defendant was arraigned as a multiple offender in the court below, and (2) as to whether, under Alabama Law, the indictments for those crimes were or could have been consolidated. (Cf. People ex rel. Janosko v. Fay, 6 N Y 2d 82; People v. Taylor, 16 A D 2d 944, affd. 13 N Y 2d 675.) Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 9, 1966, denying defendant’s motion for resentencing, reversed, on the law, and motion remitted to the court below for the purpose of taking further proof (1) as to the dates of the commission of the crimes for which defendant was convicted in Alabama, which crimes resulted in the judgments of conviction by reason of which defendant was arraigned as a multiple offender in the court below, and (2) as to whether, under Alabama Law, the indictments for those crimes were or could have been consolidated. (Cf. People ex rel. Janosko v. Fay, 6 N Y 2d 82; People v. Taylor, 16 A D 2d 944, affd. 13 N Y 2d 675.) Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 852, 280 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bean-nyappdiv-1967.