People v. Beal

297 A.D.2d 588, 747 N.Y.2d 178, 747 N.Y.S.2d 178, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8768

This text of 297 A.D.2d 588 (People v. Beal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Beal, 297 A.D.2d 588, 747 N.Y.2d 178, 747 N.Y.S.2d 178, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning identification. Both the purchasing and “ghost” undercover officers made reliable identifications of defendant.

[589]*589Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 588, 747 N.Y.2d 178, 747 N.Y.S.2d 178, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-beal-nyappdiv-2002.