People v. Beaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Beaker

2017 NY Slip Op 4569, 151 A.D.3d 501, 53 N.Y.S.3d 543

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 2017

Docket4223 2431/01

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4569 (People v. Beaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Beaker, 2017 NY Slip Op 4569, 151 A.D.3d 501, 53 N.Y.S.3d 543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), entered February 13, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed 15 points under the risk factor for drug or alcohol abuse, based on the presentence report regarding an earlier conviction and information in the case summary (see e.g. People v Johnson, 77 AD3d 548 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 705 [2011]). In any event, regardless of whether defendant’s correct point score is 130 or 115 points, he remains a level three offender, and we find no basis for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The fact that defendant has been deported is not an appropriate basis for such a departure (see e.g. People v Zepeda, 124 AD3d 417 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 902 [2015]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), entered February 13, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed 15 points under the risk factor for drug or alcohol abuse, based on the presentence report regarding an earlier conviction and information in the case summary (see e.g. People v Johnson, 77 AD3d 548 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 705 [2011]). In any event, regardless of whether defendant’s correct point score is 130 or 115 points, he remains a level three offender, and we find no basis for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The fact that defendant has been deported is not an appropriate basis for such a departure (see e.g. People v Zepeda, 124 AD3d 417 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 902 [2015]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 4569, 151 A.D.3d 501, 53 N.Y.S.3d 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-beaker-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack