People v. Bazile

2019 NY Slip Op 8685
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 4, 2019
DocketInd. No. 17-00454
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 8685 (People v. Bazile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bazile, 2019 NY Slip Op 8685 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Bazile (2019 NY Slip Op 08685)
People v Bazile
2019 NY Slip Op 08685
Decided on December 4, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 4, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2018-10524
(Ind. No. 17-00454)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Stanley Bazile, appellant.


James D. Licata, New City, NY (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant.

Kevin P. Gilleece, Acting District Attorney, New City, NY (Tina L. Guccione of counsel; Coleen A. Forte on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kevin F. Russo, J.), rendered August 8, 2018, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of the right to appeal was valid, as the record demonstrates that it was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341-342; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Batista, 167 AD3d 69, 73). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9).

DILLON, J.P., COHEN, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Torres
2020 NY Slip Op 309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 8685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bazile-nyappdiv-2019.