People v. Bazemore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bazemore

272 A.D.2d 64, 707 N.Y.S.2d 831, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 64 (People v. Bazemore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bazemore, 272 A.D.2d 64, 707 N.Y.S.2d 831, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Collins, J.), rendered February 6, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 4 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The People sufficiently complied with CPL 240.45 (1) (b) by turning over to defendant a copy of the complainant’s NYSID record, and the People were not obligated to also obtain and produce certificates of conviction (compare, People v Moore, 244 AD2d 776, lv denied 91 NY2d 975, with People v Clark, 194 AD2d 868, 869, lv denied 82 NY2d 752; see also, CPL 60.60 [2]). In any event, defendant was not prejudiced by the lack of certificates of conviction or by the court’s refusal of his request for a mid-trial adjournment to obtain such certificates. Defendant was apprised of the complainant’s convictions and was able to make effective use of that information on cross-examination and summation. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Collins, J.), rendered February 6, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 4 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The People sufficiently complied with CPL 240.45 (1) (b) by turning over to defendant a copy of the complainant’s NYSID record, and the People were not obligated to also obtain and produce certificates of conviction (compare, People v Moore, 244 AD2d 776, lv denied 91 NY2d 975, with People v Clark, 194 AD2d 868, 869, lv denied 82 NY2d 752; see also, CPL 60.60 [2]). In any event, defendant was not prejudiced by the lack of certificates of conviction or by the court’s refusal of his request for a mid-trial adjournment to obtain such certificates. Defendant was apprised of the complainant’s convictions and was able to make effective use of that information on cross-examination and summation. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 64, 707 N.Y.S.2d 831, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bazemore-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack