People v. Baynes
This text of 256 A.D.2d 471 (People v. Baynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from an amended sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered June 9, 1997, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of a violation of a sentence of probation and imposing a sentence of imprisonment.
[472]*472Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D.2d 471, 685 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-baynes-nyappdiv-1998.