People v. Baynes
121 A.D.2d 643, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58630
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 23, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgments affirmed. The defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of Penal Law § 70.25 (2-b) is without merit (see, People v Cusick, 119 AD2d 830). Criminal Term properly imposed the mandatory surcharge on each judgment (see, Penal Law § 60.35 [1]). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Baynes, 121 A.D.2d 643, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
121 A.D.2d 643 (People v. Baynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bethea
133 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)