People v. Baynes
121 A.D.2d 643, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58630
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 23, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 121 A.D.2d 643 (People v. Baynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Baynes, 121 A.D.2d 643, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
Judgments affirmed. The defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of Penal Law § 70.25 (2-b) is without merit (see, People v Cusick, 119 AD2d 830). Criminal Term properly imposed the mandatory surcharge on each judgment (see, Penal Law § 60.35 [1]). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Bethea
133 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 A.D.2d 643, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-baynes-nyappdiv-1986.