People v. Baxter

190 A.D.2d 1014, 593 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1207
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: At trial, defense counsel informed the court that she had made a mistake in exercising her peremptory challenges when she excused juror number 13 instead of juror number 6. She requested the court to discharge juror number 6 even though that juror had been sworn. On appeal, defendant argues that, because of counsel’s mistake, defendant was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. We disagree. That inadvertent error does not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799).

We have reviewed the issues raised by defendant in his pro [1015] se brief and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baxter, 190 A.D.2d 1014, 593 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 1014 (People v. Baxter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hammock
255 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)