People v. Battle

2026 NY Slip Op 00790
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 2026
DocketInd. No. 70418/23
StatusPublished

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 00790 (People v. Battle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Battle, 2026 NY Slip Op 00790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Battle (2026 NY Slip Op 00790)
People v Battle
2026 NY Slip Op 00790
Decided on February 11, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 11, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
LOURDES M. VENTURA
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.

2023-05042
(Ind. No. 70418/23)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Dayvon Battle, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Samantha Jerabek of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Charles T. Pollak of counsel; Agnes T. Chang on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Michael J. Yavinsky, J.), rendered May 10, 2023, convicting him of criminal contempt in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention regarding the duration of the orders of protection issued at the time of sentencing is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to object to the duration of the orders of protection at sentencing (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316-318; People v Almonds, 238 AD3d 893). Under the circumstances, we decline to reach this contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Demilio, 227 AD3d 1098, 1100-1101; People v Mensah, 221 AD3d 732, 733).

BARROS, J.P., DOWLING, VENTURA and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Nieves
811 N.E.2d 13 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Mensah
221 A.D.3d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 00790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-battle-nyappdiv-2026.