People v. Battle

204 N.E.2d 208, 15 N.Y.2d 669, 255 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 805
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 3, 1964
StatusPublished

This text of 204 N.E.2d 208 (People v. Battle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Battle, 204 N.E.2d 208, 15 N.Y.2d 669, 255 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 805 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

Order affirmed.

Concur: judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scilekpi and Bergak. Chief Judge Desmohd dissents and votes to reverse and grant a hearing on this corain nobis petition, in the following memorandum: These unusual and undisputed facts make it'at the very least a triable question of fact (to which a negative [671]*671answer seems inevitable) as to whether defendant, youthful, ignorant and without counsel, had any real understanding as to his rights when he waived immunity and gave testimony before the Grand Jury which resulted in his indictment and thus produced the result that after he had been arraigned on the indictment he had no choice but to plead guilty. Talcing no part: Judge Fold.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 N.E.2d 208, 15 N.Y.2d 669, 255 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-battle-ny-1964.