People v. Bator

178 A.D.2d 928, 578 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17735

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s argument that prosecutorial misconduct on summation deprived him of a fair trial. The statements of which defendant now complains were not so prejudicial as to require reversal, given the strength of the People’s case (see, People v Curley, 159 AD2d 969, 970, lv denied 76 NY2d 733; People v Banks, 124 AD2d 1064, lv denied 69 NY2d 824, cert denied 484 US 834).

The trial court adequately explained the applicable legal principles to the jury (CPL 300.10 [2]). Because this case was relatively uncomplicated and the jury was adequately apprised of defendant’s position, the court’s marshalling of the [929]*929evidence was not necessary to a fair trial (see, People v Patterson, 121 AD2d 406, lv denied 68 NY2d 759). We decline to modify defendant’s sentence in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bator, 178 A.D.2d 928, 578 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

178 A.D.2d 928 (People v. Bator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Patterson
121 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Banks
124 A.D.2d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Curley
159 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)