People v. Batista

197 A.D.2d 456, 602 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 21, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered April 10, 1991, convicting defendant, upon her guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of AVi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The hearing court properly found the police had probable cause to arrest defendant (see, People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594, 602). The arresting officer testified that he had heard specified details of defendant’s description broadcast over the radio, and that she matched that description (see, People v Lypka, 36 NY2d 210, 213-214; People v Petralia, 62 NY2d 47, 51-52; compare, People v Brodie, 87 AD2d 653 [2d Dept]). This testimony was sufficient to conclude that defendant’s arrest was based on probable cause. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Batista, 197 A.D.2d 456, 602 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

197 A.D.2d 456 (People v. Batista) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Foster
270 A.D.2d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Jenkins
208 A.D.2d 459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)