People v. Bastien

142 A.D.3d 1183, 37 N.Y.S.3d 910
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 2016
Docket2015-03586
StatusPublished

This text of 142 A.D.3d 1183 (People v. Bastien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bastien, 142 A.D.3d 1183, 37 N.Y.S.3d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal by the de-

fendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leach, J.), imposed April 28, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, after remittitur from this Court (see People v Bastien, 124 AD3d 907, 908 [2015]), on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the resentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]).

Eng, P.J., Austin, Roman, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bastien
124 A.D.3d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 A.D.3d 1183, 37 N.Y.S.3d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bastien-nyappdiv-2016.