People v. Bassik

425 N.E.2d 873, 53 N.Y.2d 1032, 442 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2560
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 1981·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The trial court did not err in refusing defendant’s request to have the jury instructed concerning the possibility of his being civilly committed if found not guilty by reason of insanity. At the time of this trial it was well settled that the defendant was not entitled to such a charge (People v Adams, 26 NY2d 129, 138). The legislative change in this rule (CPL 300.10, subd 3) did not go into effect until September 1, 1980 (L 1980, ch 548), after this trial had concluded.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bassik, 425 N.E.2d 873, 53 N.Y.2d 1032, 442 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2560 (N.Y. 1981).

425 N.E.2d 873 (People v. Bassik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl Becker
818 N.W.2d 135 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2012)
Erdman v. State
542 A.2d 399 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1988)
Bassik v. Scully
588 F. Supp. 895 (E.D. New York, 1984)