People v. Bass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bass

25 A.D.2d 437, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5228

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 10, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 437 (People v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bass, 25 A.D.2d 437, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 2, 1964 after a jury trial, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Action remitted to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this decision. In the interim the pending appeal will be held in abeyance. In our opinion, a hearing must be held before the trial court to determine the voluntariness of the confession in accord with People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72). After such hearing, the procedure prescribed in People v. Korda (24 A D 2d 577) should be followed.

Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 2, 1964 after a jury trial, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Action remitted to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this decision. In the interim the pending appeal will be held in abeyance. In our opinion, a hearing must be held before the trial court to determine the voluntariness of the confession in accord with People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72). After such hearing, the procedure prescribed in People v. Korda (24 A D 2d 577) should be followed.

Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 437, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bass-nyappdiv-1966.