People v. Bartello

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Bartello

192 N.W.2d 664, 35 Mich. App. 599

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 26, 1971

DocketDocket No. 9296

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 192 N.W.2d 664 (People v. Bartello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bartello, 192 N.W.2d 664, 35 Mich. App. 599 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant was tried and convicted of conspiracy to commit abortion. MODA § 750.157a (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.354[1]). MCLA § 750.14 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.204). He was sentenced to a term of 2-1/2 to 4 years in prison. His motion for a new trial was denied.

On appeal the defendant has raised two questions. The two eases cited in support of his position on the first issue are readily distinguishable on the facts. The second issue has not been adequately briefed and argued and is considered by this Court to be abandoned. Mitcham v. City of Detroit (1959), 355 Mich 182; People v. Williams (1971), 29 Mich App 420; and People v. Heard (1971), 31 Mich App 439. No argument or formal submission is necessary.

The motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant was tried and convicted of conspiracy to commit abortion. MODA § 750.157a (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.354[1]). MCLA § 750.14 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.204). He was sentenced to a term of 2-1/2 to 4 years in prison. His motion for a new trial was denied.

On appeal the defendant has raised two questions. The two eases cited in support of his position on the first issue are readily distinguishable on the facts. The second issue has not been adequately briefed and argued and is considered by this Court to be abandoned. Mitcham v. City of Detroit (1959), 355 Mich 182; People v. Williams (1971), 29 Mich App 420; and People v. Heard (1971), 31 Mich App 439. No argument or formal submission is necessary.

The motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 N.W.2d 664, 35 Mich. App. 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bartello-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack