People v. Barry

288 A.D.2d 940, 732 N.Y.S.2d 203, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10727
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]; § 1193 [1] [c]) and one count of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [3]). By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Hill, 254 AD2d 726, Iv denied 92 NY2d 1050). In any event, the plea allocution was factually sufficient to support defendant’s plea. The bargained-for sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barry, 288 A.D.2d 940, 732 N.Y.S.2d 203, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

288 A.D.2d 940 (People v. Barry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Verhow
291 A.D.2d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Feliciano
289 A.D.2d 1051 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)