People v. Barry

209 A.D.2d 426, 618 N.Y.S.2d 440

This text of 209 A.D.2d 426 (People v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Barry, 209 A.D.2d 426, 618 N.Y.S.2d 440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered December 17, 1991, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, attempted assault in the second degree, and menacing (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant a four-week, rather than an approximately seven-week, continuance due to the illness of defense counsel’s husband (see, People v Arroyave, 49 NY2d 264; People v Gelo, 32 AD2d 661).

The defendant’s contention that the sentence is excessive is without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Arroyave
401 N.E.2d 393 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Gelo
32 A.D.2d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 426, 618 N.Y.S.2d 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barry-nyappdiv-1994.