People v. Barrett

213 A.D.2d 416, 624 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2423
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County [417]*417(Goldstein, J.), rendered November 19, 1992, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that it was error for the court to have permitted into evidence the complainant’s out-of-court statements that the defendant raped her is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bacchus, 175 AD2d 248; People v Alston, 163 AD2d 398). In any event, the testimony complained of on appeal was properly admitted as evidence of the complainant’s "prompt outcry” that she had been raped (see generally, People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10; People v Rice, 75 NY2d 929). Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barrett, 213 A.D.2d 416, 624 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 416 (People v. Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Archer
232 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Grady
229 A.D.2d 503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)