People v. Barracks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Barracks

106 A.D.3d 752, 963 N.Y.S.2d 874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.3d 752 (People v. Barracks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Barracks, 106 A.D.3d 752, 963 N.Y.S.2d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered November 6, 2008, convict[753]*753ing her of tampering with physical evidence, resisting arrest, and obstructing governmental administration, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P, Dickerson, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered November 6, 2008, convict[753]*753ing her of tampering with physical evidence, resisting arrest, and obstructing governmental administration, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P, Dickerson, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.3d 752, 963 N.Y.S.2d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barracks-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack