People v. Baroody

221 A.D.2d 980, 635 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13478

This text of 221 A.D.2d 980 (People v. Baroody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Baroody, 221 A.D.2d 980, 635 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his conviction of criminal mischief in the third degree is not supported by legally sufficient evidence. We disagree. The evidence established that defendant damaged "property of another person” (Penal Law § 145.05); further, it was within the province of the jury to conclude that the reasonable cost of repairs to the vehicle that defendant damaged exceeded $250 but not $1,500. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Sirkin, J.—Criminal Mischief, 3rd Degree.) Denman, P. J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 145.05
New York PEN § 145.05

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 A.D.2d 980, 635 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-baroody-nyappdiv-1995.