People v. Barone

2019 NY Slip Op 3353
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 2019
Docket2017-02609
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3353 (People v. Barone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Barone, 2019 NY Slip Op 3353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Barone (2019 NY Slip Op 03353)
People v Barone
2019 NY Slip Op 03353
Decided on May 1, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 1, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-02609

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Frank Barone, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 2951/16)


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Roni C. Piplani of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Stephanie Zaro, J.), imposed January 31, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133). The record does not demonstrate that the defendant understood the distinction between the right to appeal and the other rights that are automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty (see People v Steffens, 164 AD3d 616; People v Laboy, 153 AD3d 1363; People v Contreras, 112 AD3d 649, 649; see also People v Muniz, 163 AD3d 589, 589-590). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude appellate review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

AUSTIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, COHEN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Laboy
2017 NY Slip Op 6551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Contreras
112 A.D.3d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 3353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barone-nyappdiv-2019.