People v. Barondess

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Barondess

8 N.Y. Crim. 376, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 248

DecidedMay 15, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.Y. Crim. 376 (People v. Barondess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Barondess, 8 N.Y. Crim. 376, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 248 (N.Y. 1892).

Pincite

Opinions

The judgment of the general term was reversed by the court of appeals upon the dissenting opinion of Judge Daniels, and no opinion was written by the judges, as follows:

Per Curiam.

“ Order of general term reversed, and judgment of conviction affirmed, on opinion of Daniels, J., below.”

Earl, C.J., Andrews, Finch and Peckham, JJ., concur.

Gray, J., reads for affirmance of general term. O’Brien and Maynard, JJ., concur.

A dissenting opinion was written by Judge Gray, as follows :

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI