People v. Baron

126 A.D.3d 992, 3 N.Y.S.3d 626
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Baron. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 A.D.3d 516
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 2015·No. 2012-10079·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered June 21, 2012, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*993 The defendant contends that his guilt was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Wright, 129 AD2d 600 [1987]). Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Balkin, J.P., Hall, Miller and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baron, 126 A.D.3d 992, 3 N.Y.S.3d 626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

126 A.D.3d 992 (People v. Baron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Wright
129 A.D.2d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)