People v. Barnwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Barnwell

155 A.D.2d 886, 549 N.Y.S.2d 609, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14712

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1989·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow expert testimony regarding the deficiencies in eyewitness identification (see, People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430, 433; People v Valentine, 53 AD2d 832; People v [887] Schor, 135 Misc 2d 636). We have considered the claims raised by defendant in his supplementary brief and find that none requires reversal. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — rape, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow expert testimony regarding the deficiencies in eyewitness identification (see, People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430, 433; People v Valentine, 53 AD2d 832; People v [887] Schor, 135 Misc 2d 636). We have considered the claims raised by defendant in his supplementary brief and find that none requires reversal. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — rape, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

People v. Barnwell, 155 A.D.2d 886, 549 N.Y.S.2d 609, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

155 A.D.2d 886 (People v. Barnwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related