People v. Barnwell
This text of 155 A.D.2d 886 (People v. Barnwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow expert testimony regarding the deficiencies in eyewitness identification (see, People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430, 433; People v Valentine, 53 AD2d 832; People v [887]*887Schor, 135 Misc 2d 636). We have considered the claims raised by defendant in his supplementary brief and find that none requires reversal. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — rape, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 A.D.2d 886, 549 N.Y.S.2d 609, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barnwell-nyappdiv-1989.