People v. Barnum

Supreme Court of Colorado

People v. Barnum

53 P.3d 646, 2002 WL 262017

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided February 12, 2002·No. No. 01SC165·Published

Opinion

ORDER OF COURT

Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Martinez and Justice Bender are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be affirmed; whereas Justice Kourlis, Justice Hobbs and Justice Rice are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Coats does not participate.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by operation of law. C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice COATS does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF COURT

Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Martinez and Justice Bender are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be affirmed; whereas Justice Kourlis, Justice Hobbs and Justice Rice are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Coats does not participate.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by operation of law. C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice COATS does not participate.

People v. Barnum, 53 P.3d 646, 2002 WL 262017 (Colo. 2002).

Pincite

53 P.3d 646 (People v. Barnum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.