People v. Barnett

275 A.D.2d 718, 713 N.Y.S.2d 476, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9136
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Barnett. Read the opinion of the Court — 278 A.D.2d 660

Opinion

—Appeal, by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered June 25, 1997, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and statements he made to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention on appeal, the hear[719]*719ing court properly denied his motion to suppress his written statement (see, People v Rodney, 85 NY2d 289; People v Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or do not warrant reversal (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barnett, 275 A.D.2d 718, 713 N.Y.S.2d 476, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

275 A.D.2d 718 (People v. Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodney
648 N.E.2d 471 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Anderson
364 N.E.2d 1318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
People v. Tarsia
405 N.E.2d 188 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)