People v. Barnes

305 A.D.2d 1095, 759 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4881
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Fisher, J.), entered April 5, 2001, convicting defendant after a jury trial of, inter alia, murder in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see generally People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). Defense counsel had a discernible strategy, and it is not for this Court “to second-guess whether a course chosen by [defense] counsel was the best trial strategy, or even a good one, so long as defendant [1096]*1096was afforded meaningful representation” (People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 799-800 [1985]). Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his further contention that Supreme Court erred in admitting evidence that witnesses identified a codefendant in a lineup (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see 470.15 [6] [a]). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barnes, 305 A.D.2d 1095, 759 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 1095 (People v. Barnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mastowski
26 A.D.3d 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)