People v. Barnes

197 A.D.2d 925, 604 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9416
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Barnes. Read the opinion of the Court — 178 A.D.2d 482

Opinion

—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The court should have held a hearing to determine whether the photo identification of defendant by the victim was confirmatory and, if not, whether the identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive (see, People v Rodriguez, 79 NY2d 445). We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions on appeal and we find them to be without merit. The verdict is supported by the weight of the evidence and the court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPL 30.30. We remit the matter to Supreme Court, therefore, for a hearing as required by People v Rodriguez (supra). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Assault, 1st Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Lawton, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barnes, 197 A.D.2d 925, 604 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

197 A.D.2d 925 (People v. Barnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
593 N.E.2d 268 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)