People v. Barnes

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Barnes

209 N.E.2d 114, 16 N.Y.2d 626, 261 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1325

DecidedMay 27, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 209 N.E.2d 114 (People v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Barnes, 209 N.E.2d 114, 16 N.Y.2d 626, 261 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1325 (N.Y. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. The requirement of subdivision (1) of section 40 of the New York City Criminal Court Act that a defendant be advised that he has a right to a trial before a three-Judge court was satisfied in this case when defendant elected to be tried before a single Judge. We see no substance [628]*628to the claim that the narcotics were obtained by an illegal search and seizure. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. The requirement of subdivision (1) of section 40 of the New York City Criminal Court Act that a defendant be advised that he has a right to a trial before a three-Judge court was satisfied in this case when defendant elected to be tried before a single Judge. We see no substance [628]*628to the claim that the narcotics were obtained by an illegal search and seizure. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 N.E.2d 114, 16 N.Y.2d 626, 261 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barnes-ny-1965.