People v. Barkley
This text of 651 N.W.2d 905 (People v. Barkley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Leslie Arnet BARKLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 8, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J. dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to consider the relationship between M.C.L. § 750.227b and M.C.L. § 750.224f and to determine whether and under what circumstances convictions of the two offenses violate double jeopardy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 N.W.2d 905, 467 Mich. 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barkley-mich-2002.