People v. Barkley

651 N.W.2d 905, 467 Mich. 887
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 16, 2002·No. 120215, COA No. 235801·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

651 N.W.2d 905 (2002)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Leslie Arnet BARKLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 120215, COA No. 235801.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 16, 2002.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 8, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J. dissents and states as follows:

I would grant leave to consider the relationship between M.C.L. § 750.227b and M.C.L. § 750.224f and to determine whether and under what circumstances convictions of the two offenses violate double jeopardy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barkley, 651 N.W.2d 905, 467 Mich. 887 (Mich. 2002).

651 N.W.2d 905 (People v. Barkley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Holtzer
651 N.W.2d 905 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2002)