People v. Barker

113 A.D.3d 1114, 977 N.Y.2d 653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Barker. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 A.D.3d 1111
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 3, 2014·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of strangulation in the second degree (Penal Law § 121.12). Defendant’s contention that County Court erred in refusing to make the presentence report (PSR) available to him before sentencing is without merit inasmuch as defendant did not request the PSR before sentencing (see generally CPL 390.50 [2] [a]). Defendant’s contention that the court erred in refusing to make the PSR available to him in connection with this appeal is likewise without merit. Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Scudder, P.J., Fahey, Eeradotto, Garni and Valentino, JJ. [As amended by 115 AD3d 1275.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barker, 113 A.D.3d 1114, 977 N.Y.2d 653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

113 A.D.3d 1114 (People v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 121.12
New York PEN § 121.12