People v. Barcliff

18 A.D.3d 666, 794 N.Y.S.2d 682
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 16, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), rendered February 7, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he could have been convicted only of intentional murder (see Penal Law § 125.25 [1]), and that the evidence was legally insufficient to support a conviction [667]*667of depraved indifference murder (see Penal Law § 125.25 [2]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]) is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c], [6] [a]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barcliff, 18 A.D.3d 666, 794 N.Y.S.2d 682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

18 A.D.3d 666 (People v. Barcliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Scott
24 A.D.3d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)