People v. Barber

26 N.Y.S. 417, 9 N.Y. Crim. 23, 56 St. Rep. 304, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 304, 74 Hun 368
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 6, 1893·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

HERRICK, J.

It seems to me that the indictment sets forth an offense under section 218 of the Penal Code.1 The evidence shows that the defendant was committing an offense under section 448 of the Penal Code. The person who made the arrest, and whom the defendant assaulted, was a constable, and the defendant’s offense was committed in his presence. Under section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a constable had authority to [418] arrest him for such offense without a warrant. The judgment should therefore be affirmed. I see no occasion for an opinion. All concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Barber, 26 N.Y.S. 417, 9 N.Y. Crim. 23, 56 St. Rep. 304, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 304, 74 Hun 368 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

26 N.Y.S. 417 (People v. Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Killian
74 Misc. 2d 120 (New York County Courts, 1973)
United States Ex Rel. Zaffarano v. Corsi
63 F.2d 757 (Second Circuit, 1933)
People v. Doyle
11 A.D. 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
People v. Van Houten
11 N.Y. Crim. 420 (New York Court of Sessions, 1895)