People v. Barber

26 N.Y.S. 417, 9 N.Y. Crim. 23, 56 St. Rep. 304, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 304, 74 Hun 368
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 6, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 417 (People v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Barber, 26 N.Y.S. 417, 9 N.Y. Crim. 23, 56 St. Rep. 304, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 304, 74 Hun 368 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

HERRICK, J.

It seems to me that the indictment sets forth an offense under section 218 of the Penal Code.1 The evidence shows that the defendant was committing an offense under section 448 of the Penal Code. The person who made the arrest, and whom the defendant assaulted, was a constable, and the defendant’s offense was committed in his presence. Under section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a constable had authority to [418]*418arrest him for such offense without a warrant. The judgment should therefore be affirmed. I see no occasion for an opinion. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Killian
74 Misc. 2d 120 (New York County Courts, 1973)
United States Ex Rel. Zaffarano v. Corsi
63 F.2d 757 (Second Circuit, 1933)
People v. Doyle
11 A.D. 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
People v. Van Houten
11 N.Y. Crim. 420 (New York Court of Sessions, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 N.Y.S. 417, 9 N.Y. Crim. 23, 56 St. Rep. 304, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 304, 74 Hun 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barber-nysupct-1893.