People v. Barber
This text of 74 N.Y.2d 653 (People v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant had no right to file a supplemental pro se brief in the Appellate Division and under the circumstances presented we find no abuse of discretion by the court in denying him permission to do so (see, People v White, 73 NY2d 468 [decided herewith]). We have considered defendant’s remaining points and find they are either lacking merit, unpreserved or not grounds for reversal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 N.Y.2d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barber-ny-1989.