Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Barbara

People v. Barbara

442 N.E.2d 60, 57 N.Y.2d 727, 455 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3655
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 9, 1982
StatusPublished

This text of 442 N.E.2d 60 (People v. Barbara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Barbara, 442 N.E.2d 60, 57 N.Y.2d 727, 455 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3655 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed. The statutorily mandated sentence is not unconstitutional as applied to this defendant. (People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100; People v Jones, 39 NY2d 694.)

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Broadie
332 N.E.2d 338 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Jones
350 N.E.2d 913 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 N.E.2d 60, 57 N.Y.2d 727, 455 N.Y.S.2d 763, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-barbara-ny-1982.