People v. Baptiste

131 A.D.3d 1178, 16 N.Y.S.3d 745
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 2015·No. 2013-08097·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the de fendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed March 12, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

As the defendant correctly contends, the waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. Notwithstanding the defendant’s execution of the written waiver form, it cannot be said that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Brown, *1179 122 AD3d 133, 145-146 [2014]). Therefore, review of his excessive sentence claim is not precluded.

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Dickerson, Chambers and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Baptiste, 131 A.D.3d 1178, 16 N.Y.S.3d 745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

131 A.D.3d 1178 (People v. Baptiste) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)