People v. Bannister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bannister

140 A.D.2d 531, 528 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5415

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 A.D.2d 531 (People v. Bannister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bannister, 140 A.D.2d 531, 528 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

We find that the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the screwdrivers which were seized pursuant to a search incident to his lawful arrest (see, Chimel v California, 395 US 752, 762-763). In addition, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements given by him to the police since these statements were not the fruits of an unlawful arrest (see, Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471, 485).

The defendant’s remaining contention has not been preserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We find that the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the screwdrivers which were seized pursuant to a search incident to his lawful arrest (see, Chimel v California, 395 US 752, 762-763). In addition, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements given by him to the police since these statements were not the fruits of an unlawful arrest (see, Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471, 485).

The defendant’s remaining contention has not been preserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A.D.2d 531, 528 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bannister-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack