People v. Banks

117 A.D.3d 1481, 984 N.Y.S.2d 909
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Banks. Read the opinion of the Court — 125 A.D.3d 1276

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered September 4, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.16 [12]). We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass her challenge to the severity of the sentence inasmuch as “ ‘no mention was made on the record during the course of the allocution concerning the waiver of defendant’s right to appeal’ with respect to [her] conviction that [she] was also waiving [her] right to appeal any issue concerning the severity of the sentence” (People v Peterson, 111 AD3d 1412, 1412 [2013]; see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928 [2012]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Lindley and Valentino, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Banks, 117 A.D.3d 1481, 984 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

117 A.D.3d 1481 (People v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maracle
973 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
People v. Peterson
111 A.D.3d 1412 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)