People v. Banks

273 A.D.2d 129, 711 N.Y.S.2d 716, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Banks. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 A.D.2d 163

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered March 25, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The jury’s verdict rejecting defendant’s agency defense was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence clearly established that defendant acted primarily for his own benefit, and the benefit he received cannot be characterized as incidental (see, People v Herring, 83 NY2d 780, 782-783; People v Lam Lek Chong, 45 NY2d 64, 75, cert denied 439 US 935). Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Banks, 273 A.D.2d 129, 711 N.Y.S.2d 716, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 129 (People v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Herring
632 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Lam Lek Chong
379 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)