People v. Banks

100 A.D.2d 780, 474 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17882
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 10, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 780 (People v. Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Banks, 100 A.D.2d 780, 474 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinions

Appeal from a judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patrick McGinley, J.), rendered October 14,1981, convicting defendant on a plea of guilty to robbery in the third degree and sentencing him as a predicate felon to a term of 2 to 4 years, is held in abeyance and the matter remanded for a hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and identification testimony (CPL 710.60, subd 4). f As the People concede on the appeal, defendant was entitled to a Wade and Mapp hearing on the issue of suppression of the identification testimony and the physical evidence and, accordingly, the matter should be remanded, with the appeal held in abeyance pending the remand (see People v McNeil, 55 AD2d 573). Since the prosecution did not concede the truth of the factual allegations made by defendant in support of his omnibus motion to suppress (CPL 710.60, subd 2, par [a]), the statute required the court to hold a hearing and make findings of fact (CPL 710.60, subd 4). The prosecution’s version of the facts was in sharp disagreement with that alleged by defendant, a further basis for a hearing. We find the record insufficient to make our own findings of fact and conclusions of law. Concur — Sandler, Sullivan, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gilpin
190 A.D.2d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Alvarez
151 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Otero
151 A.D.2d 236 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Acosta
150 A.D.2d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Ramos
130 A.D.2d 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Patterson
129 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Madera
125 A.D.2d 238 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Martinez
111 A.D.2d 30 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.2d 780, 474 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-banks-nyappdiv-1984.