People v. Bankers' Loan & Investment Co.
This text of 34 N.Y.S. 235 (People v. Bankers' Loan & Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant company having suffered a loss of $150,000, the board of directors charged this loss, pro rata, against the stock of the company’s shareholders, in establishing the book value of shares, and the single question submitted for decision is whether the board had authority for the act Unquestionably, a board of directors has no power to reduce the capital stock of a corporation, as fixed by its constitution. Railroad Co. v. Schuyler, 34 N. Y. 30; Sutherland v. Olcott, 95 N. Y. 93; Railway Co. v. Allerton, 18 Wall 233, 234. If the defendant may be said to have a capital stock, its amount is not ascertained, nor is it reduced otherwise than to meet losses sustained by the company in the prosecution of its business. The board of directors has the management of the common concerns of the company (article 4 of the constitution). Tayl. Corp. §§ 180, 683. And we are of the opinion that to charge the losses of the company against its stock was an ordinary incident of its administration. People v. Lowe, 117 N. Y. 175, 22 N. E. 1016. By article 8 of defendant’s constitution, the book value of a share of stock is ascertained by charging losses against shares. This is precisely what was done, and we conclude it to be clearly within the competency of the board. Tayl. Corp., supra. The order is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 N.Y.S. 235, 13 Misc. 221, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bankers-loan-investment-co-nyctcompl-1895.