People v. Bangeneaur

40 Cal. 613
California Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1871·No. No 2,651·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Temple, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court, Rhodes, C. J., 'Wallace, J., and Crockett, J., concurring:

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary. At the time he was called up for sentence, for some reason [614]*614which, does not appear, the District Attorney asked that the verdict be set aside and a new trial granted. The motion was sustained against the objection of the defendant, who, feeling aggrieved, has appealed to this Court from the order.

The statute only authorizes the Court to grant a new trial upon application of the defendant.

The order is, therefore, erroneous and must be reversed. So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bangeneaur, 40 Cal. 613 (Cal. 1871).

40 Cal. 613 (People v. Bangeneaur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thompson
10 Cal. App. 3d 129 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)
People v. Skoff
21 P.2d 118 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)