People v. Banchs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Banchs

268 A.D.2d 262, 701 N.Y.S.2d 373, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 310

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 11, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.), rendered June 19, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 years to life and 3 to 9 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s argument, the verdict convicting him of second-degree sale was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The weight of the cocaine that defendant agreed to sell to the undercover officer was independently shown to be at least one-half ounce (see, People v George, 67 NY2d 817; People v Alvarado, 228 AD2d 168, lv denied 88 NY2d 980). There was ample evidence warranting a reasonable inference that the combined weight of the recovered and non-recovered drugs far exceeded the statutory threshold.

Defendant was properly tried in absentia after he absconded during trial. The court made a sufficient inquiry into his whereabouts and appropriate factual findings as to his deliberate absence (see, People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898). Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.), rendered June 19, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 years to life and 3 to 9 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s argument, the verdict convicting him of second-degree sale was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The weight of the cocaine that defendant agreed to sell to the undercover officer was independently shown to be at least one-half ounce (see, People v George, 67 NY2d 817; People v Alvarado, 228 AD2d 168, lv denied 88 NY2d 980). There was ample evidence warranting a reasonable inference that the combined weight of the recovered and non-recovered drugs far exceeded the statutory threshold.

Defendant was properly tried in absentia after he absconded during trial. The court made a sufficient inquiry into his whereabouts and appropriate factual findings as to his deliberate absence (see, People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898). Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

People v. Banchs, 268 A.D.2d 262, 701 N.Y.S.2d 373, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

268 A.D.2d 262 (People v. Banchs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related