People v. Ballard

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Ballard

189 N.W.2d 806, 33 Mich. App. 272, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1739

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 28, 1971

DocketDocket 9402

StatusPublished

This text of 189 N.W.2d 806 (People v. Ballard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ballard, 189 N.W.2d 806, 33 Mich. App. 272, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1739 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

*273 Per Curiam.

Defendant Glenn Ballard pled guilty to the charge of assault with intent to rob being armed (MCLA § 750.89 [Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.284]) and was sentenced to a prison term of 5 to 15 years. He appeals as of right.

Defendant’s sole allegation of error is that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at the sentencing stage of the proceedings by the substitution of a different attorney from the Detroit Legal Aid and Defenders’ Association than the attorney of record present at the taking of the guilty plea. Review of the record of this proceeding reveals no prejudice was suffered by defendant as a result of the change of counsel. 1 The trial judge inquired whether defendant had anything to offer in his behalf before sentence was imposed; he responded in the negative. No error is shown, nor is any need for resentencing apparent. People v. Edwards (1969), 18 Mich App 526; People v. Moton (1970), 25 Mich App 383; People v. Thomas Smith (1971), 30 Mich App 34.

Affirmed.

1

In this regard, the instant ease is distinguished from People v. Theodorou (1968), 10 Mich App 409, where sentence was imposed without the benefit of counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*273 Per Curiam.

Defendant Glenn Ballard pled guilty to the charge of assault with intent to rob being armed (MCLA § 750.89 [Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.284]) and was sentenced to a prison term of 5 to 15 years. He appeals as of right.

Defendant’s sole allegation of error is that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at the sentencing stage of the proceedings by the substitution of a different attorney from the Detroit Legal Aid and Defenders’ Association than the attorney of record present at the taking of the guilty plea. Review of the record of this proceeding reveals no prejudice was suffered by defendant as a result of the change of counsel. 1 The trial judge inquired whether defendant had anything to offer in his behalf before sentence was imposed; he responded in the negative. No error is shown, nor is any need for resentencing apparent. People v. Edwards (1969), 18 Mich App 526; People v. Moton (1970), 25 Mich App 383; People v. Thomas Smith (1971), 30 Mich App 34.

Affirmed.

1

In this regard, the instant ease is distinguished from People v. Theodorou (1968), 10 Mich App 409, where sentence was imposed without the benefit of counsel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 N.W.2d 806, 33 Mich. App. 272, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ballard-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack